H.R. 2289 Cell Tower Fast-Track Bill Stalls — But Remains Active
U.S. House / Environmental Health Sciences | April 2026
H.R. 2289, the American Broadband Deployment Act, advanced in the House earlier this spring but has not been brought to a final vote and appears to have stalled for now.
The bill was placed on the House Union Calendar in mid-April, but no further action has been taken. Advocacy groups report that the legislative process slowed after a scheduled Rules Committee step, leaving the bill pending without additional movement.
If enacted, H.R. 2289 would expand fast-track approvals for wireless infrastructure and further limit local authority over siting decisions, building on existing federal preemption under the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
While the bill has not moved forward, the underlying policy direction remains active. Similar proposals to streamline infrastructure deployment and limit local control could reappear in future legislation or regulatory actions.
Read more:
House legislative status updates: https://www.billsponsor.com/bills/745208/house-bill-2289-congress-119
Environmental Health Sciences update (includes a “take action” link):
https://ehsciences.org/the-cell-tower-fast-track-bill-stalled-but-not-stopped/
Data Center Proposal in Dickerson: “Atmosphere,” Industry Interest, and Resident Response
Recent reporting by Bethesda Magazine confirms that data center developers are actively targeting the Dickerson area in western Montgomery County, citing factors such as available land, proximity to major power infrastructure, and regional demand spilling over from Northern Virginia. The article places Montgomery County within a broader industry trend as data center expansion moves into new jurisdictions.
Among the companies referenced is Atmosphere Data Centers, which has been publicly associated with data center development concepts dating back several years and is now part of the local discussion. The company promotes its approach using language such as building the “greenest and most energy-efficient data centers on Earth,” reflecting a broader industry emphasis on sustainability-focused branding. However, key details about any specific proposal—including project scale, energy sourcing, and the legal entity responsible for development—have not yet been clearly established in publicly available materials. (Update 6/18/2026: ICYMI CEO of Atmosphere insisted MCA “back off asap” and alleged that MCA was funded by the Chinese Communist Party, and this related Montgomery County, MD resident testimony at the June 16th Data Center Public Hearing: direct youtube link )
At the local level, residents and community groups have already begun organizing and speaking out. At a recent County Council hearing, residents raised concerns about the potential impacts of large-scale data center development in the Dickerson area, including effects on the rural landscape, infrastructure demands, corporate power/serving of global markets vs. local needs, and long-term planning for the community. Community engagement has extended beyond hearings, with public forums and campaign events drawing attention to the issue and prompting responses from county executive candidates.
Advocacy groups such as Climate Change Action Network Action Fund have highlighted a potential gap between sustainability-oriented marketing and underlying energy realities. In public materials, CCAN points to the contrast between “green” branding claims and the absence—so far—of clearly defined renewable energy commitments, while also raising concerns about the scale of electricity demand and associated emissions. Some widely circulated estimates appear to be based on modeled projections, underscoring the need for clearer, project-specific information.
Taken together, the Dickerson proposal reflects more than a single project—it highlights the convergence of industry expansion, marketing narratives, resident concern, and early advocacy pressure, raising important questions about energy use, land use, and transparency as Montgomery County considers how to approach large-scale digital infrastructure.
Read more:
- Bethesda Magazine:
https://bethesdamagazine.com/2026/04/06/why-the-data-center-industry-came-to-dickerson/ - CCAN Action Fund statement:
https://ccanactionfund.org/environmental-leaders-demand-100-clean-power-for-proposed-dickerson-data-center-in-montgomery-county/ - Montgomery County Council (ZTA 26-01 amendments):
https://www2.montgomerycountymd.gov/mcgportalapps/Press_Detail.aspx?Dept=1&Item_ID=48522 - Atmosphere Fact Sheet: https://maierwarnerpr.app.box.com/s/hhmull4pqi22aku71hmnpmdgauw0lkfm
County Executive Candidates Respond to Data Center and AI Concerns
Montgomery Community Media / WAMU Candidate Forum | March–April 2026
At a recent county executive candidate forum, as reported by Montgomery Community Media, data center development emerged as a key issue, reflecting growing public concern about proposals in the Dickerson area.
According to Montgomery Community Media, multiple candidates stated that any data center project in Montgomery County should meet strong energy standards, including the use of 100% clean or renewable power. Some candidates also raised concerns about the pace of development, with calls for additional review or a potential pause to allow for further study.
The discussion followed increased engagement from residents and advocacy groups, indicating that community concerns are already shaping the policy conversation.
AI and school-based monitoring technologies have also been raised as emerging issues, though there have been fewer detailed policy positions publicly articulated by candidates to date.
Read more:
Maryland Moves to Restrict “Surveillance Pricing”
Good News Network / Maryland General Assembly | April 2026
Maryland is considering legislation that would restrict or ban the use of personal data to set individualized prices, a practice often referred to as “surveillance pricing.”
The approach targets pricing systems that use data such as browsing history, location, or purchasing behavior to determine what a specific consumer is charged for the same product or service. The issue has gained attention as companies increasingly deploy AI-driven pricing tools that can adjust prices in real time.
The legislation reflects growing concern that data collected through digital platforms is being used in ways that are not visible to consumers and may result in unequal pricing outcomes. If enacted, Maryland would be among the first states to directly address this practice.
The proposal is part of a broader trend toward regulating how personal data is used in automated decision-making systems, particularly where transparency and accountability are limited.
Read more:
https://www.goodnewsnetwork.org/maryland-to-become-first-us-state-to-ban-surveillance-pricing/
Help raise awareness
- Share this post with neighbors, community groups, and local networks
- Post to Facebook, Nextdoor, and other platforms where local issues are discussed
- Tag relevant organizations and elected officials to bring visibility to these issues